PILGRIM LUTHERAN CHURCH
  • Home
  • About Us
    • What We Believe
    • History
  • Pastor's Blog
  • Bulletin
  • Contact

A Sabbath Day's Journey

By: Rev. Paul Landgraf
What is a Sabbath day's journey? First of all, it is a Jewish expression. We measure distances in meters or yards. The Jews had a certain distance that they could walk on Saturday before it would be considered work. So their synagogues that they went to on Saturday could not be very far away. The word appears only in Acts 1:12 and indicates a distance of about three-quarters of a mile.

With that in mind, I think it is important to remember the origins of Christianity. Just because we have an Old Testament, it does not mean that we call it the 'Outdated Testament'. Much of the Old Testament has a literary structure that we are not aware of because of our modern emphasis on chapter and verse divisions. Within many of these blogs, I try to get the reader to see a bigger picture, a larger perspective that often includes the Old Testament and the environment that was present when the New Testament was seeing the Light of the day.

Second, a Sabbath day's journey is intentionally short. These 'journeys' with a text, almost always one of the three readings for that Sunday, are deliberately brief discussions. This blog was never designed to be a comprehensive look at any text. Sometimes a specific word is studied in detail. But, as a whole, a blog entry, by itself, is meant to be quite brief.

Finally, since the term 'Sabbath day's journey' appears in Acts, it is meant to appeal to a wide variety of people. This blog is meant for those who cannot come on Sunday mornings. And it is also for those who do come on Sunday mornings but would also like a further study of the text. It is also for those who live somewhere else in the world (besides Drake and Freedom, Missouri, USA) and would simply like a further study of the text. It was meant to get these different groups of people to start thinking about the biblical texts. Part of the reason for this blog is that I am not able to have a bible class on Sunday mornings with either congregation, and so, to have a blog like this seemed like a good idea. I hope it is helpful for you, in whatever situation you may be.

Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. And thank you for taking the time to read this!

December 03rd, 2022

12/3/2022

0 Comments

 
Last Sunday, with the new church year, we started to look at beginning of the Gospel according to Matthew, and we only got through one verse. What comes after this verse is the only detailed genealogy within this account, and you can imagine how quickly this text and those that are like it are overlooked. But it should be said that this genealogy is significant. There are certainly some run-on sentences within this text, but you could say that they are running on toward a very special goal.

The following is a somewhat-literal translation of the genealogy in the Gospel according to Matthew (1:2-16; and since they will be grouped and numbered by the writer immediately following this text, they will be grouped and numbered here as well; it should also be noted that the spelling of some names is different from that which was in the Old Testament, so you may wish to compare this to other translations):

Abraham (1) begat Isaac (2), and Isaac begat Jacob (3), and Jacob begat Judas and the brothers of him (4), and Judas begat Phares and Zara out of Thamar (5), and Phares begat Esrom (6), and Esrom begat Aram (7), and Aram begat Aminadab (8), and Aminadab begat Naason (9), and Naason begat Salmon (10), and Salmon begat Boez out of Rachab (11), and Boez begat Obed out of Ruth (12), and Obed begat Jesse (13), and Jesse begat David, the king (14) [Matthew 1:2-6a].

And David begat Solomon out of the … of Uriah (1), and Solomon begat Roboam (2), and Roboam begat Abia (3), and Abia begat Asaph (4), and Asaph begat Josaphat (5), and Josaphat begat Joram (6), and Joram begat Ozias (7), and Ozias begat Joatham (8), and Joatham begat Achaz (9), and Achaz begat Hezekias (10), and Hezekias begat Manasses (11), Manasses begat Amos (12), and Amos begat Josias (13), and Josias begat Jechonias and the brothers of him at the deportation of Babylon (14) [Matthew 1:6b-11].

And after the deportation of Babylon, Jechonias begat Salathiel (1), and Salathiel begat Zorobabel (2), and Zorobabel begat Abiud (3), and Abiud begat Eliakim (4), and Eliakim begat Azor (5), and Azor begat Sadoc (6), and Sadoc begat Achim (7), and Achim begat Eliud (8), and Eliud begat Eleazar (9), and Eleazar begat Matthan (10), and Matthan begat Jacob (11), and Jacob begat Joseph (12), the husband of Mary, of whom was begotten Jesus, the one called Christ (13) [Matthew 1:12-16].

Keeping in mind the numbering that was included above, you can imagine how much has been said of the following verse (1:17, and this is also in a somewhat-literal translation).

Therefore, all the generations from Abraham until David, generations fourteen, and from David until the deportation of Babylon, generations fourteen, and from the deportation of Babylon until the Christ, generations fourteen.

If Matthew was indeed a tax collector, you would think that he should be able to count accurately up to the number fourteen. With his job he would probably would have had to count to much higher numbers.

First of all, as was noted last week, the number fourteen is connected to King David and is very special. There are at least a couple of ways to get to the number fourteen with the last section of the genealogy. One could also simply count the last generation of the second section twice, once in the second section and another time at the beginning of the third and last section. One could also add another number at the end because of not just Joseph but also Mary, or not just because of the name of Jesus but also because of the title of ‘Christ’. Or one could simply ‘round up’ to the number fourteen, since thirteen is very close, and that number fourteen is very important.

The number of words in the Greek in each section may help to give some clarity. Numbers of words have been important from literally day one, when the first creation account makes a big deal of the number seven. And in the first two verses of Genesis, the numbers of Hebrew words are seven and fourteen, and the number seven is an important number in the creation account which follows. And it is helpful to know where the words are broken up since paper was expensive in ancient times and the space between words was sometimes extremely small.

People have looked at the various ways that things are added to parts of this genealogy. There are mentions of brothers, there are additional names of women—and sometimes there are names that are left out. There is the mention of the deportation. But the total number of words might be pointing to something important.

In the first verse, the verse that was examined last week, the number of words is eight. That happens to be a very Jewish number. And the number of words of the next section, the first section from Abraham to David, is eighty-two. The next section, from David to the deportation, is also eighty-two. And the third section, because of its shortness—since there were only thirteen generations—is only seventy-four words. While that last number is not necessarily a Hebrew number, when it is combined with the number of words from the very first section, the total is also eighty-two. And, if those two sections are connected, then in the middle of the two sections that each had eighty-two, there is, at the very middle, the mention of King David.

Is the number eighty-two important? It also does not seem to be a Jewish number, but it is interesting that when fourteen, fourteen, and thirteen are added together, the total is forty-one, and that is exactly one-half of the way to eighty-two.
​

Perhaps this tax collector DID know how to count. And it seems as though he was able to count accurately past the number fourteen.

Perhaps a proper focus would be on his words and not his person. He was, after all, just a follower. And perhaps the Christ who had—and continues to have—so many unique followers should be valued as well.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    January 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    October 2023
    September 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • About Us
    • What We Believe
    • History
  • Pastor's Blog
  • Bulletin
  • Contact