PILGRIM LUTHERAN CHURCH
  • Home
  • About Us
    • What We Believe
    • History
  • Events
    • Photo Gallery
  • Pastor's Blog
  • Bulletin
  • Contact

A Sabbath Day's Journey

By: Rev. Paul Landgraf
What is a Sabbath day's journey? First of all, it is a Jewish expression. We measure distances in meters or yards. The Jews had a certain distance that they could walk on Saturday before it would be considered work. So their synagogues that they went to on Saturday could not be very far away. The word appears only in Acts 1:12 and indicates a distance of about three-quarters of a mile.

With that in mind, I think it is important to remember the origins of Christianity. Just because we have an Old Testament, it does not mean that we call it the 'Outdated Testament'. Much of the Old Testament has a literary structure that we are not aware of because of our modern emphasis on chapter and verse divisions. Within many of these blogs, I try to get the reader to see a bigger picture, a larger perspective that often includes the Old Testament and the environment that was present when the New Testament was seeing the Light of the day.

Second, a Sabbath day's journey is intentionally short. These 'journeys' with a text, almost always one of the three readings for that Sunday, are deliberately brief discussions. This blog was never designed to be a comprehensive look at any text. Sometimes a specific word is studied in detail. But, as a whole, a blog entry, by itself, is meant to be quite brief.

Finally, since the term 'Sabbath day's journey' appears in Acts, it is meant to appeal to a wide variety of people. This blog is meant for those who cannot come on Sunday mornings. And it is also for those who do come on Sunday mornings but would also like a further study of the text. It is also for those who live somewhere else in the world (besides Drake and Freedom, Missouri, USA) and would simply like a further study of the text. It was meant to get these different groups of people to start thinking about the biblical texts. Part of the reason for this blog is that I am not able to have a bible class on Sunday mornings with either congregation, and so, to have a blog like this seemed like a good idea. I hope it is helpful for you, in whatever situation you may be.

Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. And thank you for taking the time to read this!

March 19th, 2022

3/19/2022

0 Comments

 
This week is the Third Sunday in Lent, and during this Lenten journey of 2022 we have been looking at St. Paul’s long and difficult voyage to Rome in Acts as a positive thing. He had made a case for Christianity before King Agrippa, and it was time to make that case before Caesar. And we have seen how the progression that occurs in the details of the beginning of that voyage has some connections to the beginning of the creation account—and THAT account is certainly a positive thing.

To remind you of the order of the first verses in Genesis, first there is an overview that God created everything. Then there is a brief description of the chaos. And then, there was the Spirit (literally the ‘wind’ or ‘breath’) of God over the waters. And then there was the creation of light. And then there was the calling of things ‘day’ and ‘night’.

The events of Paul’s trip are in reverse order to Genesis. It was previously pointed out in the talk of St. Paul to King Agrippa (and others) that Paul first used the word ‘day, and then ‘light’, and then, when he was traveling, there was the emphasis on the wind pushing the ship around. The section that was translated last week ends up with the ship in the midst of a terrible storm, and this is the last verse [27:20] that was included in last week’s writing (and, as I warned you before, it is quite depressing): ‘And neither sun nor stars appearing over many days, and not a little stormy weather was lying down hard [on us], finally all hope for us to be saved was taken away.’ If there is a deliberate literary connection to the reverse order of creation, this point is perhaps a connection to the chaos that was before creation. And those who have ever been out on the water in the midst of the storm may also be thinking ‘chaos’.

An additional point could be made about the double negative description of ‘not a little’, the peculiar description of the stormy weather that was happening. (These are called ‘litotes’ if you are interested—OR if you are not disinterested.) Do not focus too much on these descriptions. By using them, the writer does not have to use more attractive words such as ‘great’, ‘many’, etc. And using those words would probably attract too much attention to what is happening.

Now since these double negatives are much more frequent in the second half of the book of Acts, this may help the reader (or listener) focus more on the important first half of the work, when the church goes from Jesus leading his disciples to Jesus leading his Church with a clear statement of what the gospel is (see Acts 1-15). After all, the Gospel according to Luke is described as what Jesus BEGINS to do and to teach (see Acts 1:1). Although what happens later is most certainly true and important to some extent, it is not as important as the first half of this book.

The last part of that verse above is probably the most depressing, that ‘all hope for us to be saved was taken away.’ Now there is an appropriate response to such a thing. Given the reverse progression of the creation account, the next thing described is that God creates the heavens and the earth. The response, after all hope is lost, is that God definitely will be doing something. (He is, after all, the ULTIMATE starting point.) And, in the case of this storm, he chooses to do something through St. Paul.

Below is a somewhat-literal translation of Paul’s response to the very depressing situation of Acts 27:1-20. The following text is 27:21-26, and these are his words to those who are on the ship with him (and although it does NOT contain a LOT of sailor terminology, you may still wish to look at it in another translation; I have tried, in some places, to keep the order of the words in the same order as the Greek text):

And there being much abstinence, then Paul standing in the midst of them, said, “It is necessary, O men, not obeying me to set sail from Crete and to gain both this injury and loss. And now I urge you to be in good spirits; for throwing away of life there will be none of you, but of the ship. For stood by me, this night, of God, of whom I am, whom also I serve, an angel, saying, ‘Fear not, Paul; Caesar it is necessary for you to stand before, and, behold, God has granted to you all the ones sailing with you.’ Wherefore, be in good spirits, men. For I believe God that thus it will be in the way in which it was spoken to me. But into a certain island it is necessary for us to fall off.”

There are a LOT of things could be said about ANY words taken from the Bible. Both what is said and the way it is said is important. And, therefore, the order in which these words come is important.

With the emphasis on NECESSITY from the mouth of Jesus in the Gospel according to Luke from the beginning [at Luke 2:49] to the end [at Luke 24:26] shows how important that idea is in this talk as well. It is given THREE times in such a very short time.

It is first of all, the very first word that is recorded out of the mouth of St. Paul. In its first use, he is telling the group that they should have listened to him. But he does not continue to focus on that. In fact, there are two times that he encourages them to ‘be in good spirits’.

In the second use of ‘necessity’, St. Paul is sharing with those on the ship what the angel of God shared with him, that it is necessary for him to stand before Caesar. The angel, Paul, and Caesar are all mentioned quite close together. And all three of them—even Caesar—are certainly not as important as God. And he happens to be mentioned three times within this short text as well.

The third use of ‘necessity’ has to do with ‘falling off’ or, in sea-faring language, ‘running aground’, since it is a certain island to which St. Paul is referring. This is what happens, and we can certainly focus too much on the ability to predict the future. It is better to focus on the One behind it all.
​

At the beginning of St. Paul’s talk, he says that those in charge of the ship should have ‘obeyed’ him. The word ‘to obey’ is made up of the words ‘persuasive’ and ‘ruler’. The people who ruled in some way had their chance. The same could be said about many people today. The fact that God still ‘granted’ to St. Paul all the ones sailing with him is a wonderful thing. And this word is very closely connected to the word for ‘grace’ or ‘gift’. And the verbal form of the word, in the so-called ‘perfect’ tense, makes this a lasting thing. And THAT is NOT a BAD picture of God.

0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Archives

    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • About Us
    • What We Believe
    • History
  • Events
    • Photo Gallery
  • Pastor's Blog
  • Bulletin
  • Contact